In describing tax monies given to "family planning services" as a "stimulus" to the economy, it's obvious what she meant... Fewer children will reduce costs to the states. She's taking a page right out of the ChiCom Handbook.
Fewer children will reduce costs to the state. Because of this economic down-turn the states can't afford all these unplanned children. The states will get more bang for their buck by paying for abortions rather than the medical costs of child-birth, WIC, Food Stamps,...
This is the America the Left wants.
Monday, January 26, 2009
9 comments:
Your First Amendment right to free speech is a privilege and comes with a measure of responsibility. You have the right to exercise that responsibility here but we reserve the right to inform you when you've used that right irresponsibly.
We are benevolent dictators in this regard. Enjoy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
But... but... but...Federal funds for Planned Parenthood go to other services besides abortions, right?
ReplyDeleteSorry, Eric, just thought I'd get that argument in before our resident Libtards bring it up.
As Z said, "I'm wondering how anybody'd get solace from the fact that ALL the money we give isn't 'just for abortions'?"
Good being the enemy of Perfect.
ReplyDeleteIf our politics can't be pure conservative then they are pure liberal.
If our economy can't be pure free-market then they are socialistic.
If our morality can't be strict conservative then it is pure immorality.
If you are right in one thing, then you are right in all.
These are the tenets of a conservative mind that can not accept subtlety. A mind that does not accept the reality of reality. That people and ideas and events and all things else are not homogeneous.
Bent,
ReplyDeleteYou speak as one who believes that man should be pliable to outside forces rather than stand firmly for principle and virtue regardless of difficulty.
You put the cart before the horse when you say "if morality can't be strict conservative..." when rather, it is we are conservative and that is evident in our attachment to morality. We see morality as a given to which we comport ourselves, and you see man as the given and morality should be based on the nature of man. You speak of subtlety, nuance, gray areas, all signs of a weak constitution. Believer or atheist, that's just a childish way to live.
Nice soliloquy Ben, but it addresses nothing, and is a distortion of the truth.
ReplyDeleteNow, anyone want to address Nancy's position on cutting back on live births to keep the states financially solvent?
ReplyDeleteI will, Eric. That's inhuman. Here's an idea:
ReplyDeleteWhy don't we cut out Nancy Pelosi? That would save the taxpayers millions. And, she's more useless than an unborn baby.
BTW Eric, Naw, that's OK. I don't see much point in labels anyway. Just figured if you or someone else wants to add labels, be my guest.
ReplyDeleteWell actually Mark, unborn babies are not entirely useless. Without them Planned Parenthood would be bankrupt inside of six-months. So you see they do serve a purpose; one of equal importance with Nancy Pelosi because of whom also, were it not for her and her ilk, Planned Parenthood would be bankrupt inside six months. But unborn babies don't vote, and are not therefore a viable constituency. The Nancy Pelosi's and Barack Obama's of this world will therefore always have the upper-hand. Unless the People rise up and change it.
ReplyDeleteWhat she's REALLY saying is, "I'm determined to give new meaning to the phrase "STUPID AS A BOX OF ROCKS"."
ReplyDeleteThink of the increased revenues from 50 million more tax payers. Too bad people like her had them killed before they were born.