Saturday, January 31, 2009

Enemies of America in One Accord! (Link Fixed)

I've often commented on my own blog and others about the close resemblance between the American Left, Murderous socialists, and Radical Jihadists.

And then I come across this article at Hot-Air!

I am so right so much of the time It's almost frightening!

I love the term that has been offered up to describe the enemies of the United States of America (though it has heretofore only been applied to Obama cultists, the term easily applies to ALL of this nation's enemies).

The term?

Obamists

Obama-President of PART of the People!

A question for our resident libtards:

Why is President Obama giving exclusive interviews to Arab news agencies while millions of American citizens in the mid-west are going without water and electricity? Why is he comforting our enemies while allowing our rural citizens to suffer needlessly?

I know...he hates white people and wants them to die!

UPDATE!

Like those at Hot-Air, I'm wondering how the present Prez will justify his Super Bowl party while people are freezing to death in the midwest!

Related - Obama Dozed, People Froze

Ice-Battered Kentucky Pleads For Help From Storm

Comment on EIC TV's Ice Storm Video by a concerned Missourian

More Related - Barack Obama Hates White Folk

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

True Descent

People of logic, reason and true love for America need to be on the phones to their elected representatives to thwart this true roadmap to moral depravity and injustice, laughingly dressed up as "civil rights". How did Patrick Moynahan describe it? Oh yeah. "Defining deviancy downward". It continues unabated if good men do nothing.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Obama's First Official Interview as President

is given to a foreign Muslim news outlet, al-Arabiya.

Good idea? Or Bad? What message does it send to the Arab world? What message does it send to Americans?

Monday, January 26, 2009

What She's REALLY saying

In describing tax monies given to "family planning services" as a "stimulus" to the economy, it's obvious what she meant... Fewer children will reduce costs to the states. She's taking a page right out of the ChiCom Handbook.



Fewer children will reduce costs to the state. Because of this economic down-turn the states can't afford all these unplanned children. The states will get more bang for their buck by paying for abortions rather than the medical costs of child-birth, WIC, Food Stamps,...

This is the America the Left wants.

The First Amendment: Obama's Next Victim?

"You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," ~ Barack Hussein Obama

Hey, Folks! Remember when President George W. Bush told America to stop listening to Keith Olbermann? Remember when Bush told you to pay no attention to Chris Matthews? Remember when he told us that we couldn't get anything done if we spend too much time listening to Al Franken?

I'll wait while you search your data base.

Conservative talk radio is all a-twitter over President Barack Hussein Obama's suggestion that we stop listening to Rush Limbaugh.

At first, I didn't understand all the commotion. He only made an off-hand remark, right? He didn't mean it to be taken seriously, right?

But then I thought, "Well, why shouldn't they be upset?" After all, Conservative talk radio's livelihood consists of alerting their listeners to the outrageous words and actions of the Liberals. Conservative talk radio hosts take it very personal when some Liberal merely suggests censoring them.

But this latest outrage goes beyond something a mere Liberal says.

This is the newly elected President of the United States of America!

This is the guy that only last Tuesday took an oath to "protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution of the United States", did he not?

Suddenly he wishes to revoke a first amendment right. Only four days into his administration he has already broken his oath of office.

Focus on the word, "defend" here.

Telling us to not listen to Rush Limbaugh isn't defending free speech. It is using the power of his office in an attempt to intimidate Rush Limbaugh into shutting up.

Well, I guess we all know Rush isn't going to shut up, and in fact, he will only shout louder.

This thing has the possibility of snowballing into an all out assault on every Americans right to free speech. If Rush doesn't shut up, as Mr. Obama suggests, what might the President do?

Will he dare to ask Congress to take legislative action against dissent?

Sounds implausible, I know, but look what he's done already:

Signed executive orders to close GITMO, suspend trials of the detainees, spend our tax money to fund abortions in other countries over the objections of we who find the practice exceedingly abhorrent.

The man has sent a message of hope to terrorists and abortion providers (terrorists in their own right, I might add). In his first four days!

He has four more years to work on revoking all of our liberties and putting his Marxist agenda into place.

I'd say he has made a significant start.

Friday, January 23, 2009

Barack Obama: Murderer in Chief 2

I wonder when the nutroots will start demanding a war-crimes trial for Obama considering he has just destroyed two sites in Pakistan which includes at least one civilian home? Hey...at least "some" of those killed were militants, right?

From one murder-spree to the next...he's about to sign legislation funding the murder of babies abroad.

That's the way to fight the War on Terror...kill the terrorists at the dinner table on one hand and before they're born on the other!

UPDATE!!

The locals are saying at least thwee widdle childwen were mercilessly blown to bits in the Pakistan strike.

GOTTA believe them locals, eh?

Great Minds Think Alike

Over on my own blog, "Casting Pearls before Swine" I pointed out the media have created in Barack Hussein Obama, a bigger than life super man who is "too big to succeed". By that I mean, in their zeal to be part of the history making event of helping Obama get elected President, they have raised expectations of what Obama will accomplish as President that are impossible to achieve.

He will not meet expectations, thus, he has become too big to succeed. My exact words were, "The media, in their zeal to get The Chosen One elected, have only set America up for one huge disappointment."

Now Juan Williams has published an article in the Wall Street Journal that echos my sentiment. In the article, he writes, "There is a dangerous trap being set here. The same media people invested in boosting a black man to the White House as a matter of history have set very high expectations for him. When he disappoints, as presidents and other human beings inevitably do, the backlash may be extreme."

It is as if he read my article first and then expounded. For those who aren't familiar with Mr. Williams, he is a black contributor on the FOX news channel and NPR, and he is a Liberal.

That should give him credibility among the Liberal readers of this blog.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Still Kidding!

This little snippet speaks of the quality of Barry's appointment for AG. Eric Holder seems as lacking in judgement as Obumble himself. The cut of this man's jib leaves much to be desired.

Notice how the FALN members show the same lack of remorse for their terrorist acts as does Bill Ayers for his. Disgusting.

I saw a piece of Schmuck Schumer's faux interview of this guy and didn't get the idea, as I think back upon it, that Schmuckie had any serious questions for Holder. I wonder if any Republicans will. Unlike their counterparts, the Reps have a habit of giving the new Dude the benefit of the doubt. If ever they were to act like sore Dem-like losers, now's it. They need to dig deeply into the track records of each of Barry's picks and run them all through the ringer before letting them help run the nation.

UPDATE: Here's a piece describing the Rep's actions during Holder's confirmation. Not too impressive. At one point, the piece suggests that Holder thinks his FALN work looks worse in a post 9/11 world. Hmmm. Perhaps to idiots like himself.

You Gotta Be Kidding Me!

No, not another post about my job situation. This is just some evidence of true American Descent. I'm not saying this lunatic's point of view will ever take hold, even in a nation with the liberal half of the population suffering from acute common-sense deprivation. But to think a genius like Obamessiah would actually give a twit like this the time of day, much less a post in his administration, says volumes about the trouble the United States of America is in for over the course of the next four years. Can you believe some think he'll get eight years?

Friday, January 16, 2009

Good Advice for America under Obama

What's a President Elect To Do?

I found this while checking out stuff at the racist and poorly written AmericanThinker.com. Perhaps our Barry supporters should keep this in mind while they celebrate the empty suit on the 20th.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Unprecedented Hypocrisy!

About the $150,000,000 inauguration:

01.11.05

REP. WEINER’S LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT ASKING THAT INAUGURAL FUNDS BE USED FOR THE TROOPS

Mr. President Elect


Dear Mr. President:

The festivities surrounding your inauguration later this month are slated to cost $150 million – making this the most expensive inauguration in history. I urge you to re-direct those funds towards a use more fitting to these sober times – bonuses or equipment for our troops.

Precedent suggests that inaugural festivities should be muted – if not cancelled – in wartime. In the midst of World War II, President Roosevelt held his 1945 inaugural at the White House, making a short speech and serving guests cold chicken salad and plain pound cake. During World War I, President Wilson did not have any parties at his 1917 inaugural, saying that such festivities would be undignified.

Furthermore, $150 million could provide substantial support for our troops overseas. For example, we could buy armor for 2400 unarmored humvees or provide a $1000 bonus for each member of the armed services station in Iraq.

Please re-direct all the funds raised for the inauguration to our brave men and women in uniform.

NOTE: The preceding letter to the President was to G.W. Bush before his 2005 inauguration. Blue print indicates where I have changed words and figures to bring things up to date.

Cheers to Michelle Malkin who posted this letter on her own site.

UPDATE!! A related story from Newsbusters.

You know, I just read an Op-Ed from Rosa Parks at the L.A. Times who said that Barry-O will not give any ammunition to late-night talk show hosts. I disagree.