"The most dangerous criminal may be the man gifted with reason, but with no morals." ~Martin Luther King, jr.
Among all the other reasons Obama needs to be defeated in the upcoming Presidential elections, there is another that few are mentioning.
He is a racist.
No, he isn't positing himself before the American public with blatant racial epithets or announcing "open season on Whitey". He is more subtle.
It should come as no surprise to most Conservatives that he is not the uniter he pretends to be, but, I dare say there are many Conservatives who are loathe to hang the insidious label of "racist" on him.
But, look at his history.
Off hand, I can point to the infamous quote from his book, "White man's greed runs a world in need", among other equally racist quotes. That should have been the tip off to even the most stubborn skeptics.
Now there is an increasing number of black-on-white crimes being committed, with the apparent blessing of the "Uniter in Chief".
The more these crimes go unpublicized and unpunished, the stronger and bolder those who perpetrate these crimes grow.
No doubt, they also grow bolder, in large part, because the "Uniter -in-Chief" remains silent.
Now, let's examine the other side of the issue. Wherever there exist a mere hint of a possibility that a white on black crime has been perpetrated, Obama is quick to publicly speak out in condemnation of the "hate crime", even before any guilt has been determined. The Trayvon Martin case is only one of the latest proofs of his obvious racism.
Note the difference between the way he treats white-on-black crimes, as opposed to black-on-white crimes. He expresses outrage at one, and is conspicuously silent on the other.
Obama is giving tacit approval of these escalating black-on-white racist hate crimes by remaining silent and refusing to condemn them.
Just as the now famous open mic incident with the Russian president proves, if he is re-elected, he will drop all pretenses. He will become transparently racist.
It is important for American voters on both sides to recognize the inherent danger of an unrestrained Obama presidency.
He is limited to two terms. He has nothing to lose. He knows the Congress will not institute impeachment proceedings against him. If they attempt to, he has already laid the groundwork to brand any actions against him as "racism". Any criticism of him will enable him to stir up racial animosity in this country further.
Obama garnered 96% of the black vote in the last election, and, in spite of the loss of confidence many of those same voters have in him due to his reckless policies, he will still get a disproportionate percentage of the black vote. Because, as has become obvious, the overall attitude among blacks is, he is "one of them".
All he has to do is continue to keep silent about black-on-white hate crimes, and speak out against perceived white-on-black crimes.
The media is complicit, and will play the race card at the drop of a hat. The Republicans are too afraid to stand up against any charges of racism. That would hurt their chances to be re-elected.
A race war is imminent.
And, if he is re-elected, Obama will be the catalyst.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
7 comments:
Your First Amendment right to free speech is a privilege and comes with a measure of responsibility. You have the right to exercise that responsibility here but we reserve the right to inform you when you've used that right irresponsibly.
We are benevolent dictators in this regard. Enjoy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
And, if he is re-elected, Obama will be the catalyst.
ReplyDeleteNo, only the hate of the Obama haters will be the catalyst.
his reckless policies
Which policies would these be?
All he has to do is continue to keep silent about black-on-white hate crimes
Like he has been silent about black-on-speed limit crimes?
speak out against perceived white-on-black crimes.
Hmmm, has he actually ever done that?
the inherent danger of an unrestrained Obama presidency.
You mean like the way he implemented single-payer healthcare for all, or a public option, or ending the Bush tax cuts?
White man's greed runs a world in need
Did Obama say that?
apparent blessing of the "Uniter in Chief"
Like his apparent blessing of NBA lane violations?
Mark wrote: "White man's greed runs a world in need
ReplyDeleteThe Commenter asked "Did Obama say that?"
Jeremiah Wright, Obama's pastor of 20 years said it originally, and Obama incorporated into his argument within the covers of his book. Quoting from his book Audacity of Hope...
"It is this world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks’ greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere... That's the world! On which hope sits!"
It appears Obama believes the statement true enough to repeat it as his own; using it to make a one-sided illustration. Obama sees racism (the White variety) as the greater evil in the world. Note the examples he uses; contrasting Apartheid and the poverty of Port au Prince with the waste of Cruise Ships, the very image, in his mind, of 'White Man's Greed'
Obama incorporated into his argument
ReplyDeleteIncorporated it into his argument? How do you know this? Have you read the book? How do you know he wasn't simply recounting a sermon? What exactly IS the argument that Obama is making?
It appears
It appears? To whom?
Obama believes the statement true enough to repeat it as his own
He didn't repeat it as his own. He quoted it with attribution, just as you have quoted it yourself here.
using it to make a one-sided illustration
Again, you've read the book so you know this to be true, correct?
Obama sees racism (the White variety) as the greater evil in the world.
Your conclusion based on your reading of the book, right?
Note the examples he uses; contrasting Apartheid and the poverty of Port au Prince with the waste of Cruise Ships
As you've noted, these are Wright's words, not Obama's. It was Write who made the comparison. It was Obama that quoted a much larger section of Wright's sermon.
the very image, in his mind
And you know this how, exactly? From reading his book? His mind? His shrink's notes?
Apparently, during my absence Jim was banned from commenting on this blog, so now, he uses the "anonymous tag" and continues to deny facts as he does over at mine.
ReplyDeleteWe say, this is a fact, and his only retorts are "Liar!", and "No, it's not", etc.
While we bloggers here at AD cite facts, he simply denies them, but doesn't produce evidence that what we say is wrong.
Jim wasn't banned, necessarily. Some chicken sh*t administrator deleted some of his posts because they didn't suit his world view, I suppose.
ReplyDeleteI double dutch dare you to provide one single citation or link that would confirm that any one thing you've written in the above post is a fact (excluding the 96% of the black vote figure).
Remember, Mark. An opinion is not a fact. Yours least of all. Just so you know.
The Art of War is Divide and Conquer.
ReplyDeleteOrder out of Chaos.
Who will create the chaos?
Who will bring about the order?
Consider the following evidence that, indeed, we are all in this together.
--The TSA grabs your junk whether you voted Republican or Democrat.
--The drones fly over your backyard and aren't programmed to fly around you if you're a Republican or a Democrat.
--When they come to foreclose people's homes, they don't care if you're a Republican or a Democrat, you still get put out in the street.
--Studies show Republicans and Democrats both continue to file for bankruptcy.
--You must purchase health care insurance, or pay a penalty, regardless of whether you're a Republican or a Democrat.
Without freedom--you can't do anything, or only what you're told to do.
I Want My Country Back--the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=le7IV1ltgNE
I just want to thank you for the article; I found it both informative and thought-provoking. These are truths that really need to be spread - even though those who follow him blindly simply because of the color of his skin will argue through falsehoods and conjecture... the truth you tell here must be spread.
ReplyDelete