"Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall."--Proverbs 16:18
There really isn't much I can add to the latest Obama outrage, that of him calling the Cambridge Police Department stupid. Pretty much anything I can say has already been said by Conservative bloggers and columnists and talk show hosts.
One thing I haven't seen on any blogs is the actual police report submitted by the arresting officer, Sergeant James Crowley and Officer James Figueroa. (not that no blogs have published it)
I found the entire Police report here.
Keep in mind that filing a false police report is one of the most egregious offenses of Police Department policies. It is grounds for immediate dismissal and/or imprisonment. It is highly unlikely that a police officer would lie about what happened, especially in this case, considering the number of eyewitnesses, including both civilian and police personnel.
Plus, a police report has to be filed as soon after the incident as possible, which hardly gives Sergeant Crowley time to come up with some kind of credible fabrication.
No, Sergeant Crowley's version is undoubtedly accurate.
Now. There are a few things about this case that are glaringly obvious:
1. Henry Louis Gates is a racist bigot.
2. This is one more example of a black man shamelessly playing the proverbial race card in an effort to procure special favors or treatment.
3. Obama showed himself to be equally as despicably racist as Henry Gates.
On this last point, I would add, it's really pretty stupid to speak out in this knee-jerk fashion before all the facts are revealed. If Obama had simply said, "I have no comment at this time", he would have saved himself a lot of embarrassment.
Of course, that goes without saying.
But, instead, he stupidly assumed that a white police officer was racist because one of his racist friends said so.
That's right I said it! Obama reacted stupidly!
This is one of those cases when discretion on Obama's part would have been the wiser choice. It would have been more prudent for him to allow himself to be brought up to date on the particulars of the situation before making comment.
But that is not in Obama's nature. Obama is too arrogant.
Arrogance, as I once pointed out, is not necessarily a bad thing. Arrogance is an important trait in salesmen, for instance. It helps a salesman to believe he can close any sale regardless of the difficulty. That requires a certain amount of arrogance.
We've all seen this attitude in friends, co-workers, and enemies many times in our lifetimes, and we will continue to see it until the end of time.
But Obama's arrogance is an entirely different brand of arrogance.
This is evident in his absolute refusal to admit he was wrong to say the Cambridge Police Department acted stupidly in the arrest of Henry Gates. Pathological narcissists such as Obama would never admit fallibility in even the most innocuous matters.
What stubbornly arrogant people like Obama do when proven to be wrong about someone, is, rather than apologize, which normal people would do, simply make some kind of overture, in hopes that the offense will just go away.
And now, what do we see Obama doing?
He has offered to have a friendly little sit-down with Sergeant Crowley, Henry Gates, and himself, over a beer.
This is the typical attempt at apology exemplified by stubbornly arrogant people. It is his way of apologizing.
This offer of a meeting is simply wordplay utilized in an attempt to stem the tide of outrage over Obama's embarrassing remark. He doubtless has no intention of actually following through with his gesture.
But, assuming he would actually follow through with the invitation, which is doubtful, it will be too little, too late for Obama.
He has shown himself to be the small-minded racist bigot most of us believed him to be, and the gloss is beginning to wear off.
Apparently, this post is undebatable. No one has bothered to refute it.
ReplyDeleteAle to the chief.
ReplyDeleteAnd you guys thought that Bush was the one people wanted to have a beer with.
ReplyDeleteTurns out it's Obama.
That's because beer would seem to be the only way to tolerate time with P-BO
ReplyDeleteYeah... a beer is stiff stuff.
ReplyDeleteNo, not "stiff," but beer does have a quality that a shot of single-malt does not. A shot of The Glenlivet goes down quick and will quickly, if more follow, loosen lips that sink ships. A beer on the other hand (or two) is for most of us the unqualified expression of ease... work is over, let's take our ease, we are among friends. Beer is generally sipped, enjoyed. Something "stiff" is generally quaffed or thrown down the gullet. Beer is enjoyed, whereas the stiff stuff is too harsh to truly enjoy until the aftertaste.
ReplyDeleteAt least that has been my experience.
And I agree with Craig. Beer can make bad company more bearable. Liquor and bad company? There'll be blood. And we can't have that at the White House.