A Few Headlines of Note...

>> Monday, February 28, 2011

...just to get your blood boiling!

Rush Limbaugh: "Planned Parenthood, Doing The Job The Klan Could Never Finish"

Yes, it's a revolting thing to have to say, but it is nonetheless true. Planned Parenthood has its origins in Margaret Sanger, a eugenics proponent, who publicly defended the idea of the sterilization of blacks, the handicapped, and the general dregs of society.







"The Most Dangerous Place for an African-American is in the Womb"

And, it seems, the niece of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King agrees. In 2009 59.85% of all abortions in New York City were performed on African American women. In this country today, Genocide is being committed upon the African American population! If only liberals could see it, and do the right thing. And what would the right thing be, you ask? Stop defending the evil practice.


Obama to be Tried by Muslims 'When They Take Over U.S.?

Hey, Duckie! Is there a more kinder, gentler version of Sharia than this? One that recognizes women as having innate, God-bequeathed value? A Sharia where noses and clitoris' are honored as belonging to the women who possess them? As in, not to be cut off willy-nilly because some gray-bearded bastard doesn't want women to enjoy their lives? What better way to keep them in burkas, eh? Cut their noses off so they actually HAVE something to hide!

Now, I'll grant you; this chowder-headed guy [Anjem Choudary] from Great Britain is a nut-job. But then, so is everyone else who refuses to believe that it is not the goal of Islam to impose Sharia in the U.S., and everywhere else on earth.

Sting, in his first solo album, Dream of the Blue Turtles, beautifully expressed the foolishness of nuclear war in the song, "Russians." I would add to his sentiment, here and now, and say it would be equally foolish of the West to allow Islam unchecked freedom within its borders if we do indeed love our children... especially our daughters.

If you want to call that bigotry, fine. But according to my bible, Islam is a false religion, and I'm to give it no quarter. I am to love my neighbors, but that love should be expressed through the earnest desire and attempt to lead them to Christ. There is freedom in Christ, but there is only slavery and degradation, and eternal damnation, in Islam.

Read more...

Arrogance and Lawlessness

>> Friday, February 25, 2011

What is most stunning about this abject failure of a president is the blatant hypocrisy and lawlessness of his day-to-day mismanagement of our country. The president of the United States thinks himself above the law. Equally stunning is the number of people who support his lawlessness; making excuses for his blunders, failures and flouting of the law. Didn't this man take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, so help him God? Oh that's right, he's a constitutional scholar and he knows more about the law than the Supreme and federal courts, and he can do what he wants despite his oath because he's not a Christian worthy of the name.

Some of you who choose to read what follows will shoot it down simply because of who said it. And as to your objections, I couldn't care less. If you believe what Obama is doing is within his "right" as president, you're a fool, and idiot, unlearned, and I don't have to take you seriously.

If this were a REPUBLICAN president, doing what Obama is doing, but favoring conservative ideology instead... you aforementioned fools, idiots, and ignoramuses, would be dropping like flies from burst aneurysms and foaming-at-the-mouth apoplexy; choking on your own vomit. Which makes you all hypocrites and, again, I don't have to take you seriously. I can't even imagine what it must be like to think like you... I mean, how could you be so thoroughly devoid of sense and sensibility? to say nothing of honor and integrity?

Anyway, here it is...

Hey, folks, let's pretend for just a second. Pretend that you are the smartest person in the room, the wisest person in the world. Pretend that you are Barack Obama, President of the United States. At this moment in time, what do you focus on? What do you really "focus on like a laser"? With everything going on in the world and the country today, what do you make the biggest priority and the biggest production out of? The jobs we need and aren't getting? The exploding deficit that threatens our future? How about the soaring price of oil and the fact that we have shut down a lot of our own domestic production?

The price of oil around the world is skyrocketing. The Saudis are talking about ramping up their production. How about the crisis in the Middle East? I mean, for heaven's sake, "a crisis is a terrible thing to waste," right? We have a crisis in the Middle East, we have no job creation, the deficit continues to explode, the price of oil is soaring. We are doing nothing about compensating for that in our own country. How about Wisconsin? If you're president, the smartest person in the world, you focus on government unions and how they are choking state budgets? Do you focus on the border where unchecked illegal immigration continues?

You're The Messiah! Tell me, what do you focus on? And what's the answer?

Gay marriage.

Out of all the things going on in the country, in the world today, Obama makes a big production out of gay marriage. This is not... No, this is not a stunt. Obama, he knows how to stir the liberals. He knows how to massage the media. Of all the things going on, what do we get as a primary focus from our own president? Declaring that the Defense of Marriage Act is something he doesn't like anymore, and so he's not gonna defend it. What exactly is Obama's Plan B for oil? If the Middle East erupts entirely, what is his Plan C, what's his Plan D? He doesn't have any plan for it, because everything he does is oriented toward: How can it help him. He's out playing to the base. He's flying out to Silicon Valley last week to raise campaign cash.

It's always about him. He jumps into Arizona to pander to ethnic groups. He jumps into Wisconsin to pander to the NEA, the SEIU, and other unions. We are watching a president of the United States turn this country over to his cronies in and out of government, in and out of business and labor. This is quite a display of arrogance, ideological, self-serving arrogance. I've never seen it before in a president. I've never seen a president that does not put his country first. I've never seen that. But we're watching it right before our very eyes. His first question is always: "What will this do for me?" Whatever the issue is, whatever the story is, whatever the event is: "What will this do for me?"

And of course The Politico gets right in on the action, covering it all as a game. Their headline: "Little Downside Seen for DOMA Call." Little downside for a president acting in an unconstitutional manner simply saying, "You know, I don't like that law, I'm not gonna defend it anymore." It's a law duly passed by the representatives of the people. It has not been challenged at the US Supreme Court. He does not have the authority to declare it unconstitutional. He does not have that power. He does not have the power to say, "I'm not gonna defend it anymore," and the Politico does a story: Can he get hurt by this? We don't think so. "Little Downside Seen for DOMA Call."

Well, okay, then. If there's "little downside seen" for a president to act in ways he is not empowered to according to the law, then the next conservative president can say, based on Obama's precedent, "You know what? Obamacare is unconstitutional. I am therefore directing my attorney general to stop defending it. It doesn't exist. We've looked at it, I've never been comfortable with it, and it's just unconstitutional. We're not gonna defend it anymore." A conservative president could say, "I am directing my attorney general to stop defending the EPA's carbon dioxide regulations. I don't like what they're doing there. It's not their purview. So EPA, stand down. You can't do it. My administration is not gonna defend that anymore."

A conservative president could then say, "I am directing my attorney general to stop defending the so-called financial reform bill. I don't happen to agree with this bill. I don't like it. I never liked it when it was being debated, I never thought it shoulda passed, and so I don't care about anything else: My attorney general has just said that we're not gonna defend it anymore. So if there are parts of the financial reform bill that prevent you from doing something, go ahead and do it now, 'cause I'm not gonna prosecute you. There is no law. I'm just gonna strike it." Can you imagine?

Would the Politico be doing stories, "President Palin, Little Downside Seen for Call on Obamacare"? Can you imagine that? Can you imagine anybody in the media doing a story on the next conservative president: "You know, I don't think this guy's gonna get in any trouble here, seeing Obamacare is not gonna be defended anymore"? It'd be just the opposite. They'd be demanding the impeachment of said president. The next conservative president can say, "I have concluded these laws don't pass constitutional muster. I've decided to drop any defense of them. I! I, the president, don't like these laws. They don't count to me."

So what's happened here is Barack Obama has decided he's not gonna enforce the law. He is not enforcing a federal judge's ruling in Florida because he disagrees with it. Judge Vinson. The constitutionality of Obamacare. He is not enforcing a federal ruling in Louisiana to allow deep offshore drilling. A federal ruling says his moratorium is illegal, but to hell with the federal ruling. Barack Obama disagrees with it. Essentially Barack Obama has said, "You know what? I'm the Supreme Court! We don't need one anymore. I don't like the Defense of Marriage Act. Neither does my attorney general.

"Neither do my gay supporters and contributors. So, you know what? We're not gonna defend it anymore. I don't care what the Supreme Court thinks. It doesn't matter. I have decided." Imagine a conservative president doing this, say, on abortion. This is lawlessness. There's no other way to characterize this. This is lawlessness. He's not securing the southern border. He's not enforcing immigration laws. That is why Arizona is having to act independently -- and what does he do? He sues them! He sues the state of Arizona. He's taken sides against a United States governor in Wisconsin, and will be taking sides against many more governors as the days unfold.

So let's step back. Imagine, for the fun of it, Sarah Palin is elected president. I pick Palin only 'cause they hate her the most (and I'm not running). Imagine that Sarah Palin appoints scores of czars who are not confirmed by the Senate. These czars run the government out of the White House; they bypass the cabinet structure. Imagine that President Palin appoints as attorney general a politically partisan conservative. Imagine that attorney general takes orders from Palin on active cases, and she orders that attorney general to stop defending lawsuits against aspects of Roe v. Wade, to stop defending lawsuits against Obamacare, to stop defending lawsuits against the EPA's greenhouse gas regulations.

Imagine if President Palin directs her attorney general to sue California to enforce border security and to stop granting taxpayer benefits to illegal aliens, in violation of the supremacy clause. Imagine if President Palin did all this. Imagine President Palin ordering the Republican National Committee to work with businesses, managers and executives that contributed tens of millions of dollars to her campaign to defeat her political opponents (especially Big Labor) in places like New York, New Jersey, Michigan, California; intervening in the affairs of states. Obama's doing this. Imagine if President Palin did it. She gets hold of the guy that runs the RNC, says, "I want you to have meetings with businesspeople that contribute a lot of money to my campaign."

Imagine President Palin decides that she will not comply with federal court rulings that she disagrees with, as in Florida and Louisiana. Imagine, if you will, President Palin meeting weekly with CEOs of the oil industry, of the insurance industry, and of the health care industry in order to help them profit and prosper. Imagine if President Palin meets with these groups to try to repair the damage done by the previous president, Barack Obama. Imagine a State of the Union in a House of Representatives chamber: President Palin attacking the sitting justices of the US Supreme Court, humiliating them for a ruling in a case in a manner that she disagrees with.

Imagine President Palin hiring a fashion person and putting her on the public payroll and telling everybody what to eat while she and Todd eat whatever they want on trips to places like Vail, while her husband is eating hamburgers and fries and ice cream. Imagine President Palin sending her kids to the most expensive private school in Washington, while at the same time killing a school choice program for poor minorities in the inner city of Washington -- and, folks, I could go on and on and on. It explains everything, this sickening spectacle that is the left. Whether they pretend to be journalists, whether they are politicians, this is a dangerous force in this nation. We have to continue to expose them. That's all we can do.

That is what we will do.

When you're out there pretending, ladies and gentlemen, that you're Sarah Palin, President Palin, imagine that you don't have a birth certificate, what would happen?

Rush Limbaugh,
February 24, 2011


Thank you Rush.
You disagree? As I am not surprised you shouldn't be surprised at the following statement: You make me sick. You're not Americans-- not in any ideological sense. If you think this president is to be lauded for his lawlessness, then you're not an American. You're a hypocrite. And I can say that because we BOTH know that if it were Sarah Palin acting in the manner described above?... You'd be demanding her impeachment. And worse.

And there's more, folks...

Gingrich: If Palin Took Obama Actions, There Would Be Calls for Impeachment

Friday, 25 Feb 2011

"I believe the House Republicans next week should pass a resolution instructing the president to enforce the law and to obey his own constitutional oath, and they should say if he fails to do so that they will zero out [defund] the office of attorney general and take other steps as necessary until the president agrees to do his job."


Why can't you Obama supporters see the truth? Don't bother, I know the answer... you don't care about Truth... Honesty... or Integrity. You'd rather have a king, no better than Mubarak or Gadaffi, than a man who obeys the law.

Read more...

Okay, Mubarak is gone. Now what?

>> Friday, February 11, 2011

When all the dust finally settles who will control of Egypt? the radical Muslim Brotherhood? Yet another military general? A democratically elected leader? A religious head? Secular head?

What happens now?

This is the definition of activism: A relatively small (a few million vs 84 million in population) segment of society, in only 18 days, forcing regime change, societal change, changes in foreign relations... Who knows WHAT happens now?

Read more...

The Many Contempts of the Obama Administration

>> Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Contempt for the truth...

Economist Thomas Sowell:

"Now that two different federal courts have declared ObamaCare unconstitutional, the administration's answer is to call the courts guilty of 'judicial activism.' Barack Obama has a rhetorical solution for every problem. Remember the repeated claims of 'shovel-ready' projects that needed only federal stimulus money to get started? Last year the President quietly admitted that there were not many 'shovel-ready' projects, after all. But the phrase served its political purpose at the time -- and that was obviously all that mattered. Now, in the wake of rulings by two different courts that ObamaCare is unconstitutional, rhetoric is being mobilized again, without any fussy worries about facts."


Contempt for the American People...

Columnist John Hayward:
"Senate Republican efforts to repeal ObamaCare went down on a strict party-line vote [last week], with every single Democrat voting against (except for independent caucus member Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, and Mark Warner of Virginia, who didn't vote.) ... What Republicans are carrying into the 2012 election season is a lockstep vote from a Party desperately trying to defend a badly broken law that is hated by the people, unlawful in the judgment of a federal court, devastating to the economy, and beaten to the ground by the 26 states filing suit against it. It was already looking like a bad election for the Democrats, but now they have to run from the twisted monstrosity dragging itself behind them and vomiting waivers. [Last week's] vote was much more than a symbolic act."


Contempt for the Courts...

Investors Business Daily:
"An administration that has no respect for Congress, the courts or the Constitution has been found in contempt for reissuing a drilling moratorium that a U.S. district judge found overly broad.

The Obama administration's trouble with the courts has continued with a judge's ruling last week that the Interior Department's reinstating of a drilling moratorium followed by a de facto moratorium via an overly restrictive permitting process constituted contempt.

The administration had issued a drilling moratorium in May in waters deeper than 500 feet after the explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig off Louisiana that resulted in the spill of more than 4.1 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

In June, Martin Feldman of the Eastern District Court of Louisiana struck down Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's original moratorium, saying it was overkill based on flawed reasoning. ...

So the administration went back, rearranged a few words and a few deck chairs, and reissued its moratorium. That one was officially lifted in October, although the permitting process, which mysteriously includes shallow-water wells, has had the effect of continuing the moratorium.

Feldman was not amused. 'Each step the government took following the court's imposition of a preliminary injunction showcases its defiance,' the judge said in his ruling. 'Such dismissive conduct, viewed in tandem with the reimposition of a second moratorium ... provides this court with clear and convincing evidence of its contempt.'

...

It is not so much that the Obama administration differs with the law, but that it considers itself above it -- even above the Constitution."

Read more...

MORE EVIDENCE...

>> Wednesday, February 2, 2011

...Of Jimmy Carter's second term.


Jimmy Carter backed the radicals rather than the Shah of Iran who, like Mubarak, was a corrupt dictator, but an ally of the U.S. all the same. The end result 32 years later? An Islamic state hell bent on acquiring nukes and threatening to wipe Israel off the map.

Today, we have Obama, backing the protesters over a dictatorial president who, despite being the bad guy, is an ally of the US, who also maintains a peace treaty with Israel. What happens if radicals take over? Controlling the Suez canal? This is Obama's Jimmy Carter moment.

Let's hope, however, that Obama fares better than did President Carter. The first thing Obama could do to save the day is shut up. What happened after he opened his trap last night, throwing his support to the protesters? VIOLENT protests today.

During his campaign for the presidency Obama chided the Bush administration for seeking to impose democracy on other nations. And yet that's exactly what Obama is doing now. Shut up, Mr. President, and you just might come out ahead, but as things now stand you own the growing turmoil in Egypt.

Just as much is at stake in this crisis as was in 1979. The security of Israel is at stake. The cost of oil, electronics, and food (to name just a few) is at risk. Can America survive... can OBAMA survive potentially $5 a gallon gasoline?

This is why it is best to elect leaders with experience in leading. This neophyte is destroying everything he sets his voice, hand and ideology to.

God help America!

Read more...

Barry Obama : The Young Turk


Young Turk:
Date: 1908
Function: noun
Etymology: Young Turks, a 20th century revolutionary party in Turkey
:an insurgent or a member of an insurgent group especially in a political party : radical; broadly
:one advocating changes within a usually established group.





Photos: 1980 Taken by, Lisa Jack / M+B Gallery

Labels

"House Negro" "No One Messes with Joe" "O" "The One" 08-Election 1984 2009 Inaugural 2012 Election 9/11 abortion abortionists Air Obama Al Franken Al Gore Al-Qaeda American Youth Americarcare Assassination Scenario Atheism Barry O Bi-Partisanship Biden Billary Birth Certificate Border Security Bush Bush Legacy Change Change-NOT child-killers Christians Christmas Civilian Defense Force Clinton Code Pink Congress Conservatism Constitution Creation Darwin Del McCoury Democrat Hypocrisy Democrats Dick Morris Dr. Tiller Dubya Earth Day Elian Gonzalez Ends Justify Means Evil Evolution Evolution-Devolution Failure in Chief Fairness Doctrine Feodork Foreign Relations Free Speech Frogs Fuck America - Obama Has Gates George Orwell Gestapo Global Cooling Global Idiots Global Warmong God GOP Descent Graphic Design Great American Tea Party Gun-Control Guns hackers Harry Reid hate haters Heath Care Heretic Hillary Howard Dean Hussein ident in History identity theft Illegal Immigration Iraq Jackboots Jesus Jihadist-Lover Jimmy Carter Joe Biden Jon Stewart Kanye West Karl Rove Katrina Las Vegas Left-Wing Media Leftists Liar Liberal Media liberal tactics Liberals Liberty Lying Media Marriage Penalty Martyr Marxism McCain Media MSNBC/Obama Administration murderers Norm Coleman Obama Obama 2012 Obama Administration Obama Dicatorship Obama Lies Obama Wars Obama's Army Obamacare Obamists Olympia Snowe Partisanship perversion Piracy Police State Political Hell Political Left Populist Rage Pragmatist Prayer Proof of Citizenship Proposition 8 Racism Regime Change Revolution Ronald Reagan Rush Limbaugh Second Amendment Separation of Powers Slavery Socialist Government Tea-Bagging Tea-Parties terrorists The Raw Deal Thuggery Tom Tancredo Traitors War Criminal War on Weather War-Crimes Worst President in History

  © Blogger template Werd by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP