tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-570497968855832694.post5130073182299378400..comments2023-05-10T04:52:13.662-05:00Comments on American Descent: Demar on Leftist DominionismUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-570497968855832694.post-24877373460819744312011-09-10T02:03:19.261-05:002011-09-10T02:03:19.261-05:00How patently absurd that the two libs above would ...How patently absurd that the two libs above would pretend there is no truth in the post regarding liberal view of morality. Let us consider how often we must hear of the duties of the rich to pay more taxes, and then try to insist that lefty politicians won't say something along the lines of "Jesus says to care for the poor". Let us consider how often Dems will speak at churches, especially politicians such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, and never get heat from the ACLU and other protectors of the fictitious "separation of church and state". Indeed, is it not the left (mostly) who insists on interpreting that Jefferson quote whenever there is the slightest hint of religion having brushed ever so lightly against the arm of anything regarded as governmental?<br /><br />And the Kerry bit is an example of how the left dictates the place of religion in politics. On the one hand, the lefty politician will speak of his faith and how it shapes their lives (Yeah, right). But then on the other hand, they will pretend they are compelled to keep that to themselves and not "impose" their beliefs on the nation. What kind of idiot tries to run with that attitude? (Don't answer. The question was rhetorical. We know the answer is "a lib idiot".) If one truly believes in the faith to which they lay claim, how can seeking to bring about what that faith teaches be a bad thing for the nation? Why would a true believer keep it to himself? My position has always been that regardless of whether or not one believes in God, the teachings of the Christian faith are beneficial to the whole of society that lives by them. But the lefty politician has no spine and less real faith to pretend there is no place in his policies for the guidance of his religion.Marshal Arthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01054268632726520871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-570497968855832694.post-12998739035796484042011-09-06T19:01:34.945-05:002011-09-06T19:01:34.945-05:00Liberals love to claim the moral high-ground. But,...Liberals love to claim the moral high-ground. But, hypocritically, denounce conservatives for daring to speak of morality when those points attack the sacred tropes of liberalism.<br /><br />Whatever position DeMar stakes out for himself with his criticism of Kerry, I am not claiming any moral superiority here.Erichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08874712703862427318noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-570497968855832694.post-67985276694280162302011-09-06T14:39:14.913-05:002011-09-06T14:39:14.913-05:00I am very glad to see that at least one reader has...I am very glad to see that at least one reader has the common sense to see the utter crud and hate behind this post. I would love to see specific examples of the "religion" the author purports the left tries to inject into their politics at every turn. There are many faith based beliefs one holds and applies to their actions, but to try and hold this (which for the most part in reality is secularism) as religion is just a reversal of criticism. Then there is the giant straw man about John Kerry's argument.<br /><br />It boggles the mind how you take Kerry's opposition to one claim of the church (to oppress peoples freedom to marry who they love), and then hold him against hypothetical positions of the church that no one can be against, as if Kerry would certainly oppose them on a religious ground. Not even taking into account that those viewpoints could be shared with the church on an ethical and moral ground as well as a religous one.<br /><br />I know this blog is supposed to be propoganda, but my word! I wish there was some reason to be found in any of your arguments for the Right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-570497968855832694.post-8577639958774101182011-09-04T12:17:34.419-05:002011-09-04T12:17:34.419-05:00"I can't discount truth"
All eviden..."I can't discount truth"<br /><br />All evidence to the contrary.<br /><br />This post and the crap upon which it it based is a crock. It's one straw man after another.<br /><br />"For decades liberals have staked out politics, education, media, entertainment, and every so-called secular area of life to be their domain, and woe to anyone who attempts to enter the gates to their heavily protected and subsidized kingdom."<br /><br />This is utter nonsense.<br /><br />"they go into a frenzied dance of defiance and shock."<br /><br />You mean arguing against things they oppose, or exposing facts about efforts, organizations or people who argue against them is a "frenzied dance"? More nonsense.<br /><br />"Liberalism, especially under Obama, has shown itself to be a failure."<br /><br />Very little "liberalism" has been enacted under President Obama, and there is no way anyone can rightly call what has been done a failure.<br /><br />"If the ideologues would simply get out of the way... if WASHINGTON would get out of the way... we could work this out among ourselves."<br /><br />Would that this were so. That would require give and take, compromise. I've hardly seen anything on these pages that would suggest that any of you are willing to do that.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10004209843701697773noreply@blogger.com